Misspoken, Mistaken, and Misunderstood 13th Plus ?
The recent utterances attributed to the Government display its indecisiveness on the 13th Amendment and its incapacity to rectify a m...
 
http://weadikawa.blogspot.com/2012/01/misspoken-mistaken-and-misunderstood.html
 The recent utterances attributed to the Government display its   indecisiveness on the 13th Amendment and its incapacity to rectify a   miscommunication, which caused a misinterpretation that led to a   misunderstanding.
The recent utterances attributed to the Government display its   indecisiveness on the 13th Amendment and its incapacity to rectify a   miscommunication, which caused a misinterpretation that led to a   misunderstanding.The selection of a faulty phrase in the  course of a discussion  was pounced on by the Indian Foreign Minister  Krishna to carry home an offering  that sounded sweet to India. Not that  he replayed it mischievously- the words  and phrases amounted to indeed  what he heard and repeated. But that was not what  the president truly  meant.
The difference lies in the oft-repeated 13 plus of  the past with  the designed 13 plus of the present. Sadly the nuances  were not conveyed to the  Indian foreign minister properly. It’s a 13  plus and minus situation - to be  accurate less than more to be precise.  13A is such crap it matters not whether  it is more or less.
The  need was for a clarification that should have been made  public - which  never came. So sloppy is the government it knows not what to say  or do  and when in trouble conveniently says or does nothing. This gives rise  to  unfavorable conjecture. Such is the guidance offered by their voodoo  advisors?
It is stupid to please a few people momentarily  by making  conflicting and contradictory statements creating distrust  permanently among  most people. Credibility means much. Lose it and then  don’t expect Sri Lanka’s   word to be taken seriously across borders. This is most harmful at a  time  goodwill is paramount to the national interest. Naturally India  would not like  being served with what tastes like fudge.
Double  barrel talk can skew the esteem of a nation. Nixon’s  White House in an  attempt to cover Watergate had to utilize the phrase  ‘misspoke’;  George Orwell in his day referred to it as ‘Mis-speak’ or ‘Un-lies’  and  more recently Hillary Clinton expanded it by saying "if I misspoke that  was  a misstatement". The cumulative effect is such statements carry  the laundry  label of toxic untruths.
The preferred option  is to lay the cards on the table as the  president once did by asserting  that police and land powers cannot be vested in  the provincial  councils. This was a message transmitted up front to India. India  did  not raise any objection. It is not India’s business to interfere in the   governance of Sri Lanka - something it often does. Mystical India with  its  mysterious ways strives to be misunderstood in the region opening  doors for  China to enter.
Then why hold out to the Indian  foreign minister that the  devolution package will be based on a 13 plus  formula? It’s more than a  marketing error. Without a reservation it  obviously includes police and land  powers on a plain reading as set out  in the constitution. If it is not in the  pipeline it’s unfair to take  India for a ride. After the president makes such an  assertion, the  foreign minister cannot be blamed having to resort to verbal  gymnastics  at a press conference to overcome a thorny situation.
Under  no circumstance, in the interest of national security and  to safeguard  sovereignty, can police and land powers be devolved. The UPFA   government knows it, having extended the writ of the central government  to all  corners of the island after banishing a terrorist outfit.
If  terrorism raises it head, and it can happen if police and  land powers  are conferred, the personal security of the leadership will be more  in  peril than the sovereignty of the nation. Therefore for their own  survival -  personal and political - police and land powers will never  be devolved under a  MahindaRajapaksa regime.
Even if the  TNA leadership cries for it till their dying day it  will remain  non-negotiable in the national interest. It requires another J.R.   Jayewardene to indulge in infamy. Ranil Wickremesinghe will not commit  such a  treacherous act.
The president to his credit will  never sell the country after  regaining it unlike Ranil Wickremesinghe  who holds an invisible power of  attorney for the West. The president is  not in the league of hurrah boys in a  hospitality tent unlike some of  his ministers from the Left who shift positions  in their policy to  acquire portfolios. Police and land powers remaining with the  center is  an attribute of Rajapaksa’s political career.
How  safe are their constituents if the chief ministers go  berserk with  armed men at their beck and call? It’s best it remains in the hands  of  the head of the executive because all presidents have acted with   responsibility in exercising police powers. The lands that for years  were  safeguarded as State lands would be distributed amongst friends  and relations of  provincial politicians. Land sales at dubious prices  will become prolific. Not  that such practice is unknown in the central  government but it is more in check  as the media spotlight is  permanently focused on it.
In the North with land at the  disposal of the chief minister, in  the event of another insurrection no  premise will be available to house the  military in security zones.  Land will be at the mercy of hostile forces. The  army will be compelled  to do amphibious maneuvers in absence of land.
Then why  deliver an ambiguous message to India? Stupidity has no  end. If India  finds us speaking with a forked tongue there is greater likelihood  of a  hostile reaction.
If the recommendations on legitimate  Tamil grievances in the  LLRC report are addressed without delay, police  and land powers will become a  non-issue. With the LLRC report in hand  non-implementation of its  recommendations can give rise to a call for  international judicial intervention  again.
The issue of the  Senate is another misspoke of Keheliya  Rambukwella. The LLRC  recommended a chamber for ameliorating minority grievances  speedily.  The Senate abolished by the 1972 Constitution was not revived by the   1979 Constitution which instead introduced the concept of appointed MPs’  to  Parliament through the National List.
The Senate is  another vehicle that will act as a rest room for  servile political  sycophants resulting in the wastage of public funds. It will  not serve  to ameliorate any of the minority grievances or align the center with   the periphery. With such stupid substitutes, the Government alienates  the  minorities and assists the TNA in hindering national integration.
The president was an achiever in the first term but that form  has deserted him in the second.
ගෝමින් දයාසිරි
උපුටා ගැනීමSunday Island
2012-01-29

 
 
 
 
 
